Resources

Resources

Downloadable Forms

Frequently Asked Questions

We begin with a detailed clinical evaluation that includes muscle strength testing, range of motion assessment, gait analysis, and a review of activity level and goals. Rigid designs offer maximum stabilization for severe joint instability or paralysis, semi-rigid designs balance stability with controlled movement, and dynamic designs use flexible materials to store and release energy for more active patients. Material selection and joint type are customized to optimize both function and comfort.

Microprocessor joints use onboard sensors to measure knee or ankle position, speed, and applied force in real time. The processor continuously adjusts hydraulic or pneumatic resistance to match walking speed, slope, or surface changes—providing stability on uneven ground and a more natural, energy-efficient gait.

We consider the degree of muscle weakness, joint instability, and any involvement of the knee. An AFO supports the ankle and foot only, ideal for isolated distal weakness such as foot drop. A KAFO provides knee stabilization in addition to ankle/foot support and is recommended when quadriceps strength is insufficient for safe ambulation or when significant knee hyperextension occurs.

We place surface electrodes over targeted muscle groups and calibrate the system to detect specific EMG patterns. The prosthesis is programmed to map these patterns to discrete movements such as hand open/close or elbow flex/extend. Sensitivity and threshold levels are fine-tuned over multiple sessions to ensure reliable control under real-world conditions.

Integration is determined by the level of amputation, residual limb shape, and gait goals. Toe fillers restore shoe volume and prevent deformity, while rocker soles and arch supports redistribute pressure. Combining these elements with a partial foot prosthesis improves push-off power, stability, and overall gait symmetry.

We build in modular adjustability using interchangeable socket liners, adjustable straps, or dynamic componentry. For progressive conditions like CMT or MS, we plan for staged modifications, enabling device performance to evolve alongside the patient’s mobility needs. Regular check-ups ensure early detection and correction of fit issues.

These standardized tests quantify a patient’s functional ability, safety, and rehabilitation progress. Objective scores provide evidence to insurers that a prescribed device will directly improve mobility, reduce fall risk, or increase independence—strengthening the case for coverage.

Coverage for advanced technologies varies by insurer and state. We handle pre-authorization requests, appeals for denied claims, and grant applications through foundations specializing in limb loss and neurological conditions. Required documentation typically includes physician prescriptions, therapy notes, outcome measure scores, and detailed justification letters outlining medical necessity and expected benefits.